This is a news for Japanese version
Article by BetaTester on May 10, 2018
 Report by SA_Upc

From Murako on 5/10:

New version of Shishio Makoto added to the REM~

Shishio: (6* base)
Active: Change top row to Fire, bottom row to Dark. 2x ATK Fire & Dark for 1 turn.
LSkill: 5x ATK Dark & Fire. 2.5x ATK & slight damage reduction when 5+ connected Fire or Dark are matched.
Super Awakes:





==========

Buffs:

All 6*s gain Super Awakenings (and Limit Break if they didn't have it already)

:
Active: Base and Max CD -2. (18 -> 16, 14 -> 12)
LSkill gains '1.5x HP & ATK Fire'
Super Awakes:

:
LSkill: 2x -> 2.5x ATK on Fire & Light match.
Super Awakes:

:
LSkill: 2.5x -> 3x ATK & RCV on skill use.
Super Awakes:

:
LSkill has been adjusted, lowered the requirement for maximum multiplier.
Super Awakes:

:
LSkill: 3x -> 4x ATK when 2 Light combos, 6x -> 8x ATK when 3 Light combos.
Super Awakes:

:
LSkill: 2x -> 2.5x ATK & RCV when 2 Light combos.
Super Awakes:

:
LSkill: 3.5x -> 4x ATK when 6+ connected Wood matched.
Super Awakes:
:
Super Awakes:
Reference URL
- pad.gungho.jp/member/collabo/ruroken/180511_ruroken_shinka.html
Comment
1
By Daruki 12 days ago ( 13.0.1 ) 
Reminder that you can enjoy a creator's work without getting involved in their personal lives, whether it's disapproving or approving of their actions as an individual. There's no shame in enjoying RK and rolling a bit for nostalgia, how you feel =/= how everyone else feels just like how the creator =/= the work they created.

Good luck to those rolling, and hype @ Hiko being in the trading post!
0
Skyknight 11 days ago ( 13.0.1 ) 
The problem is more along the lines of the royalty that GungHo had to pay Watsuki. Participating in the collaboration can be seen as supporting him, however obliquely.

That said, I’d not be surprised if GungHo was under contract to maintain the collaboration a set number of times, and since Watsuki’s offense was only treated as a misdemeanor, they wouldn’t have an out.

Still, I’m pretty sure we won’t be seeing the collaboration again on this side of the Pacific...
0
By Ruining 13 days ago ( 13.0.1 ) 
(double post)
Last edited by Ruining 13 days ago ( 13.0.1 )
4
By Ruining 13 days ago ( 13.0.1 ) 
Well.

I know what I won't be rolling, free or otherwise.

I'm upset and disgusted that GungHo is promoting this after tacit admission of procuring child porn.

https://kotaku.com/rurouni-kenshin-creator-fined-for-child-pornography-pos-1823351711
-3
By cc 14 days ago ( 13.0.1 ) 
So nice to see he's still in business after the Trouble.
0
Zecendia 14 days ago ( 13.0.1 ) 
Dude what the hell?That wasn´t trouble,he was found to own child porn,thats not trouble,thats a disgusting crime and he only got fined 2000 dollars for it
0
Skyver4me in reply to Zecendia 14 days ago ( 13.0.1 ) 
sorry, who/what is this about?
4
Skyknight in reply to Zecendia 14 days ago ( 13.0.1 ) 
(Bah, won’t let me reply directly to Skyver for some reason...)

The author of Rurouni Kenshin was found to possess child...explicit material. Photographic, at that. So I have to wonder why it was apparently counted as a misdemeanor and not a felony. And why GungHo still wants connections with him—misdemeanor or felony, this still should be making him a pariah.
0
Zecendia in reply to Skyver4me 14 days ago ( 13.0.1 ) 
blerb nvm this comment,someone was faster than me in replying
Last edited by Zecendia 14 days ago ( 13.0.1 )
-5
secret in reply to Zecendia 13 days ago ( 13.0.1 ) 
People can't choose or change what they're attracted to, Holding such biological things against them is bigoted. There's a reason why people say that people who enjoy children are the new non-straight people of current society.
Last edited by secret 13 days ago ( 13.0.1 )
3
Skyknight in reply to secret 13 days ago ( 13.0.1 ) 
The problem is more a matter of acting on those impulses. The creation of the photographic material necessarily involves harm to the child (no dependable way to secure consent for children), so Watsuki was at least encouraging that harm.
1
Zecendia in reply to secret 13 days ago ( 13.0.1 ) 
Plus,there´s a difference of being attracted to a fully developed adult that can consent responsibly to any sexual interaction or alike and y know
a child that is still developing and hasnt become an adult that can fully consent.
We have attraction to other people because we seek company(which is why asexual people are actually also absolutely valid,they can instead seek company in pets).There are several other species on the planet that actually also exhibit non straight behaviour,which is often nature´s response in the case of a parental being rejecting their child(the non straight pairs often take to adopting those children).In humans this behaviour may occur as response to the human´s actually rather rampant nature of abadoning their own children as well as the overpopulation we are facing.

However,pedophilia has no such use as you are ,for one ,attracted to another human that may be unable to reproduce yet.
Pedophilia is a mental sickness.
Last edited by Zecendia 13 days ago ( 13.0.1 )
0
VII in reply to secret 13 days ago ( 13.0.1 ) 
I can't even begin to tell you how wrong it is to compare pedophilia to being same gender attracted.
Tell us what you think
Please follow the guideline when posting a comment:
- Your comment must be in English or it will be removed.
You are not logged in. Please sign in or register an account to add your comment.